Showing posts with label Cuba. Show all posts
Showing posts with label Cuba. Show all posts
Sunday, March 27, 2016
Following in Tonga's Noble Lead . . .
Freedom Is In Retreat Under Obama Presidency, Newsday, March 27, 2016. "President Barack Obama’s speech in Cuba last week is one of the best he’s made in his seven years in office. Unfortunately, he’s got a terrible record of following through on his words."
Labels:
Cuba,
Freedom House,
Newsday,
Obama Rhetoric,
US Foreign Policy
Tuesday, January 6, 2015
On Obama and Blair
Quest for Legacy Leads Obama to Castro’s Door, Yorkshire Post, January 6, 2015. "In time, Obama will get the ridiculous mausoleum of a presidential library. But that’s not enough. He’s in trouble now, and by using the power of the Oval Office to extend the hand of friendship to yet another tyranny – this time in Cuba – he’s just doing what got him elected: blaming his predecessors and believing his own magic will make things right."
Labels:
2014 US Election,
Cuba,
Obama,
Obama Rhetoric,
Tony Blair,
US Race Relations,
Yorkshire Post
Wednesday, December 24, 2014
The Best Strategy Is Always To Be Very Strong
Three Questions Worth Asking For 2015, Newsday, December 24, 2014, "Coping with the unpredictable future isn't easy. Consequences seem obvious -- once they've happened. But Carl von Clausewitz, the Prussian master famous for saying that war is the continuation of politics by other means, has good advice for dealing with unpredictability: "The best strategy is always to be very strong." If you can't predict, you can at least be prepared. And right now, I doubt that Havana, or anyone else, is worried about U.S. strength."
Labels:
British Islamists,
Clausewitz,
Cuba,
Fracking,
Islamists,
Syria,
US Energy Policy,
US Foreign Policy
Thursday, June 19, 2014
U.S. Allies at the U.N. PoA: More Needed
On Firearms, the U.S. Needs Allies at the U.N., National Review Online, June 19, 2014. "The topic has shifted at this week’s meeting of the U.N.’s Programme of Action on Small Arms (PoA). The focus on Wednesday was on the provision of foreign aid — undoubtedly a major reason why many nations are in the room. As the discussion unfolds, it’s hard to ignore just how isolated the U.S. is at the U.N. on firearms issues, and, on a related issue, just how little most of the other national delegations know about the subject."
Friday, January 3, 2014
Go Where The Going (Might Be) Easier
A Ground Game That Could Favor the U.S., Newsday, January 3, 2014. "As in the previous decade, freedom made little headway in 2013. Throughout that period, the United States has labored unsuccessfully to build free governments in the Middle East and Africa. In 2014, we should seek to promote freedom where the going may be easier."
Labels:
Afghanistan,
Cuba,
Iraq,
Morocco,
Newsday,
US Foreign Policy
Thursday, July 5, 2012
UN ATT Conference, Day Three: The Supervillains Attack!
Day Three: At the ATT, the International League of Supervillains Speaks, Heritage Foundation Foundry, July 5, 2012. "Immediately, the objections from the International League of Supervillains came fast and furious: from Iran (which complained about visa issues and opposed having meetings in parallel), Algeria (which argued that the purpose of the treaty was unclear and could not understand why so many draft treaty texts were circulating), Cuba (which wanted agreement on treaty objectives but objected to having any meetings in parallel), and Syria (which, in distracted and rambling remarks, said the same thing)."
Labels:
Arms Trade Treaty,
Bad Treaties,
Cuba,
Foundry,
Heritage Foundation,
Iran,
UN ATT
Tuesday, January 3, 2012
University Travel and Totalitarians
Blue State Travel to Cuba, Contentions, January 3, 2012. "A friend has forwarded me a solicitation from the University of Michigan’s Alumni Association to join them on a “Cultural Connection” visit to Cuba. It is a depressing piece of moral blindness. For $3,845, Wolverines can enjoy an eight day trip, complete with “a visit to a local health clinic” to “learn about socialized medicine and the delivery of social services in Cuba,” a trip to an art institute to “compare and contrast the role of the arts in Cuba and the United States” and “identify any differences in the opportunities for artistic expression,” and a “substantive discussion” with the management team of a dance company to explore “the political and financial challenges they face” (i.e. the U.S. embargo) in exporting Cuban dance culture. There is a good deal more in the same vein, including a visit to the Museum of the Revolution and dinner at the Restaurante Vieja Havana, “formerly the American Club,” but you get the picture. It would be pleasant if moral blindness was all that was involved here, but sadly, it’s not."
Labels:
Academia,
China,
Contentions,
Cuba,
Libya,
US Higher Education,
Yale University
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)