Showing posts with label George Bush. Show all posts
Showing posts with label George Bush. Show all posts
Saturday, October 4, 2014
A Tale of Two Strategies
What’s At Stake in U.S. Strategy in Syria, Newsday, October 4, 2014. "The Obama administration's strategy for Syria relies on using U.S. air power to support local forces. If this approach fails, as it has failed in the past, the United States will find itself still lacking an effective, politically viable strategy for fighting Islamist terror more than a decade after 9/11 attacks."
Labels:
Eisenhower,
George Bush,
Kosovo,
Newsday,
Nixon,
Rhetoric,
Syria,
US Armed Forces
Wednesday, May 12, 2010
On Weak British Election Analysis in Foreign Affairs
What the British Elections Were All About, New Ledger, May 12, 2010. "It’s not fair to say that Mark Blyth and Jonathan Hopkin’s piece in Foreign Affairs on “Labour Pains: Why the British General Election is a Referendum on Its Past,” is the worst piece of commentary I’ve read on the subject."
Wednesday, November 4, 2009
The Diplomacy of Solipcism
Time for Action, Not Words, Mr. President, Yorkshire Post, November 4, 2009. "What, in the year since he was elected, has Barack Obama actually done? Making speeches doesn't count. It's certainly part of the President's job to make them, and he's not disappointed. According to CBS News, in mid-July – and less than six months after his inauguration – he gave his 200th speech, and, if anything, the pace has only accelerated since then. But it's a cardinal error to mistake giving speeches for getting things done." This op-ed was written in my personal capacity.
Labels:
George Bush,
GITMO,
Iran,
North Korea,
Obama,
Personal Capacity,
Russia,
Sudan,
US Economy,
US Foreign Policy,
Yorkshire Post
Tuesday, September 15, 2009
Why Obama's Losing the Argument
Obama is Losing the Argument Because He’s Being Himself, Yorkshire Post, September 15, 2009. This article was published in my personal capacity. "Barack Obama has hit the skids. Most of his programmes remain stalled in Congress, and what little he has achieved has turned out to be unpopular. Abroad, his supposedly immense influence has not brought moderation to Iran, peace to Afghanistan, or sanity to the Scottish Executive." This op-ed was written in my personal capacity.
Friday, August 28, 2009
Example #1: Why the U.N.'s Arms Trade Treaty is a Bad Idea
The U.N.'s Arms Trade Treaty and Sanctions On Iran, Heritage Foundation Foundry, August 28, 2009. "Earlier this week, the Heritage Foundation published a lengthy study of the U.N.’s proposed Arms Trade Treaty. The study details numerous problems inherent in this proposal, which is now being considered by a New York-based working group. The campaign behind the treaty is based on faulty premises, and the treaty, if brought into being as currently projected, will facilitate, not curb, the illegal arms trade, while at the same time posing a danger to the Second Amendment, to the ability of the U.S. to resist tyranny around the world, and to U.S. export controls. In a fine article posted on Real Clear World, Michael Jacobson, a senior fellow in The Washington Institute’s Stein Program on Counterterrorism and Intelligence and a former senior advisor in the Treasury Department’s Office of Terrorism and Financial Intelligence, explains part of what is at stake."
Tuesday, July 21, 2009
When Did Britain and the US Diverge?
Barone on the Anglo-American Divergence, Contentions, July 21, 2009. "Michael Barone has a column today at Real Clear Politics that’s summed up by its title: “Britain and United States Go In Different Directions.” His thesis is cogent, and to an extent correct: the Obama Administration is trying to drag the U.S. to the left (he might well have said that the Administration is trying to Europeanize it), whereas in Britain, the next government looks likely to be Conservative, and to be more interested in shrinking the state (or at least restraining its growth) than expanding it. This divergence is limited only by the fact that it’s not easy to change the direction of politics: whatever the situation, no matter what the crisis, the status quo has inertia on its side. Arguing with Michael Barone about U.S. politics is a losing proposition. But he does miss an important piece of the British context . . . ."
Tuesday, March 31, 2009
Are the Three Circles Fading?
The Past, Present, and Possible Futures of the Anglo–American Alliance, Heritage Foundation Lecture #1116, March 31, 2009. This is a revised version of my remarks at the AEI panel on March 17, 2009.
Friday, January 16, 2009
The Anglosphere Recognized
President Bush is Right to Recognize the Value--and Values--of the Anglosphere, Heritage Foundation WebMemo #2230, January 19, 2009.
Bush: The Post-War President
The virtue of Bush's presidency – he never forgot 9/11 atrocity, January 16, 2009, Yorkshire Post.
Labels:
9/11,
George Bush,
Liberalism,
Unilateralism,
US Foreign Policy,
US Politics,
Yorkshire Post
Monday, October 27, 2008
The Coming Disillusionment
Obama may not be Bush, but he won't be what Europe expects, October 27, 2008, Yorkshire Post.
Labels:
Afghanistan,
Europe,
George Bush,
Heritage Foundation,
McCain,
NATO,
Obama,
US Foreign Policy
Monday, October 13, 2008
Bush's Last 100 Days, and Beyond
One final chance for battered Bush to make a lasting name for himself, October 13, 2008, Yorkshire Post.
Labels:
Financial Crisis,
George Bush,
Iraq War,
US Foreign Policy,
US Media,
US Politics
Subscribe to:
Posts (Atom)